Disappointing that RFK it's OK with this. I won't vote for someone who doesn't value human life...
There should be no negotiating over a human life. If they want to do something useful, birth control should be free. If you're marching and banging a drum at how many weeks it's ok to abort a baby, you're ignoring that that's a human life with its own dna. If you're using abortion as birth control, you're a lazy murderer. One can be responsible if one chooses too.
Drs and States who argue about ectopic pregnancies should get schooled however, because that's NEVER a viable pregnancy. Sad that that conversation is ever controversial.
I’m a supporter. So I’m saying this in all honesty.
If Mr. Kennedy wants zero regulation on abortion, and he wants things to be up entirely to women and doctors, then he supports abortion up to the moment of birth, correct?
I would say, that if he truly supports bodily autonomy for all, then he should at least support the bodily autonomy of a baby (fetus) of the age that a premature baby had been born, and had been kept alive. I believe that that was at 21 to 22 weeks.
To support the bodily autonomy of a reborn child, who is viable is a better position in my humble opinion.
Disappointing that RFK it's OK with this. I won't vote for someone who doesn't value human life...
There should be no negotiating over a human life. If they want to do something useful, birth control should be free. If you're marching and banging a drum at how many weeks it's ok to abort a baby, you're ignoring that that's a human life with its own dna. If you're using abortion as birth control, you're a lazy murderer. One can be responsible if one chooses too.
Drs and States who argue about ectopic pregnancies should get schooled however, because that's NEVER a viable pregnancy. Sad that that conversation is ever controversial.
A hard NO for this man who will have to give an account to the LORD for being a proponent of child sacrifice and murder.
I’m a supporter. So I’m saying this in all honesty.
If Mr. Kennedy wants zero regulation on abortion, and he wants things to be up entirely to women and doctors, then he supports abortion up to the moment of birth, correct?
I would say, that if he truly supports bodily autonomy for all, then he should at least support the bodily autonomy of a baby (fetus) of the age that a premature baby had been born, and had been kept alive. I believe that that was at 21 to 22 weeks.
To support the bodily autonomy of a reborn child, who is viable is a better position in my humble opinion.
And yet Trump ushered in Op Warp Speed and has yet to stand down or acknowledge the massive casualties and harm to children.